Showing posts with label নদী. Show all posts
Showing posts with label নদী. Show all posts

August 28, 2009

River grabbed to build market

AL lawmaker inspires Golachipa administration to build new market, save town
A wall being built in the Ramnabad river near Golachipa town in Patuakhali for the Golachipa Newmarket. The photo on the right shows the signboard for the proposed market, which a ruling party lawmaker is backing to "save the Golachipa town from tidal surges".
Photo: STAR
Sohrab Hossain, Patuakhali

The upazila administration with the help of a ruling party lawmaker is building a market on the bank of the river Ramnabad at Golachipa in the name of protecting the town from tidal surge.

Bizarre it may sound - even after the land administration of Golachipa upazila informed about the wrongdoing the upazila administration sanctioned 100 metric tonnes (MT) of rice under the government's Test Relief project to finance it.

Without specifying the amount of money Golam Mowla Roni, Awami League MP of Patuakhali-3, claims to have financially contributed to the so-called 'Golachipa New Market' project.

During a visit to the spot this correspondent found a brick wall being erected on a stretch of 1150 feet by 380 feet area by the bank of the river. Earth filling was also going on.

Barisal district environment department, Golachipa municipality as well as the upazila land administration -- all termed the market project illegal and unauthorised.

The lawmaker, however, told The Daily Star, 'I have taken the initiative to build a new market along the riverside as it will protect the town and also serve the interests of local businessmen.'

He claimed that the would-be market will not obstruct the natural water flow of the river and said, 'I'll distribute shops among local businessmen as per government policy.”

Golachipa Municipality Mayor Abdul Wahab Khalifa told The Daily Star that the market is being built without any prior permission from the municipality though such approval is required to raise any commercial structures within the municipality areas.

When contacted Golachipa Assistant Commissioner of Land Mohammad Jahangir said, “It is government's khas land and the land office has not given allotment to anyone. Even nobody has sought any permission from us for building any establishment.”

“I informed my higher officials of the matter,” he said without any further details.

Deputy Director for Environment Department in Barisal Kaysar Ahmed expressed his department's ignorance about such initiative and said, “It's illegal to fill the land of a river and it will obstruct the normal water flow.”

Golakhali Union Parishad Chairman Razzak Mia acknowledged that the Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO) sanctioned 100 MT rice under the government Test Relief project to complete the market project and he himself is overseeing it.

When contacted Abul Kasem Md Mohiuddin, UNO of Golachipa, told this correspondent, “A step has been taken to develop the land on the riverbank. After developing the land, allotments will be given to local businessmen through land office by marking the area as non-agricultural land.”

“Roni, lawmaker for Patuakhali-3 (Golachiapa-Dashmina), has taken the step to build a new market on the riverbank and he is also financially contributing to the project,” the UNO added.

Source Link
Read more »

July 4, 2009

Burnt oil, dyeing chemicals dumped into Buriganga

Helemul Alam

A boat carrying used lubricants of motor launches dump the toxic waste straight into the Buriganga with little regard for the environment and the lifeline of Dhaka. The photo was taken at the Sadarghat in the capital. Photo: Shawkat Jamil

Apart from untreated industrial and household wastes, burnt motor oil, lubricant and dyeing chemicals are also contributing greatly to the pollution of the already moribund river Buriganga.

Motor oil traders collect burnt oil from launch operators and refine only to sell those back to them. In the process of refining the muddy and pitch-black remnants are mindlessly dumped into the river.

Manual dyers who dye mainly cloth of garment factories, especially jeans, are also no less responsible for river pollution. After dyeing they also rampantly throw their leftover toxic chemical into river water.

Around 15 motor oil traders are engaged in refining burnt oil of launches while about 10 floating businessmen are involved in dyeing cloth on the riverbank, traders on the Buriganga riverbank said.

“Launch operators sell the burnt oil every two to three months. By the time each launch has around 20 litres of burnt oil,” said Hafizur Rahman, driver of Sharnadip launch of Dhaka-Shariatpur route.

“The remains after the refinement of used oil is dumped into the river,” said Dulal who once worked with a motor oil refiner.

During a visit to the riverbank at Telghat in Keraniganj on June 26 this correspondent saw a thick layer of black oil, which did not appear to be water at all.

Shafiq, working for the last 15 years with a businessman, said around 15 burnt oil refiners are involved in the business on the bank of Buriganga.

Not only that, engine boats also release burnt oil into the river thus contributing to the pollution, said Abu Naser Khan, Chairman of Save Environment Movement.

Khan said burnt oil from the motorised vehicles is thrown into the drains, which ultimately mingles with the river water around the capital. “Burnt oil is highly toxic,” he added.

Professor Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) said any kind of oil pollutes water and increases the level of pollution, which affects the eco-system of the water body.

“No life in the Buriganga is alive because of endless pollution,” he said.

During a visit to Buriganga this correspondent found that the water at several spots had turned into pitch-black colour due to reckless dumping of leftover chemicals used for dyeing cloth.

Dyers were found busy with dyeing jeans and other cloth at those places.

Shawkat, busy with dyeing cloth in Ispahani area of Keraniganj, was found emptying a drum of dyes. He said he had been doing the business for the last 25 years.

"We dye mainly the cloth of garment factories, especially jeans. We can dye around 500 pieces of cloth a day," he said.

According to him, more than 10 businessmen are involved in dyeing cloth at different points including Char Bhairab, Telghat and Muhuri Pottri on the riverbank.

Khalil, another dyer engaged in the business for the last eight years, said, “We have to heat the chemical in a drum before we soak jeans into them that turns the area into a smoky and dirty place.”

Of over 300 effluent discharge outlets at Tongi, Hazaribagh, Tejgaon, Tarabo, Narayanganj, Savar, Ashulia, Gazipur and Ghorashal, 19 carry the major discharge of domestic and industrial wastes, according to a joint study of the World Bank and Institute of Water Modelling (IWM).

Of the discharged untreated liquid waste, 61 percent are industrial and 39 percent domestic, the study says.

These outlets are the major polluters of the rivers but burnt oil or dyeing chemicals, though dumped by a small number of traders, can in no way be neglected, because these are dumped on regular basis, said Abu Naser Khan.

The Daily Star, 3 july 2009. News Link
Read more »

June 9, 2009

Controlling river pollution

It is imperative that rather than having a reactive approach, we need to think of a proactive approach to provide a practical and a sustainable solution to river pollution, writes M Ashiqur Rahman


RIVER water is considered polluted when it is altered from the natural state in its physical, chemical and microbiological composition and when its suitability for any safe and beneficial use becomes questionable. The signs of physical water contamination may become obvious through bad taste, offensive odours, unchecked growth of aquatic weeds, decrease in the number of aquatic animals, floating of oil and grease, colouration of water and so on. However, more intensive laboratory testing is required to determine the chemical and microbiological water quality parameters such as pH (to measure the level of acidity or alkalinity), dissolved oxygen, biological and/or chemical oxygen demand, phosphorus and nitrogen ion concentration, dissolved solids, heavy metals, salinity, coliform bacteria count and so forth.
Generally, our rivers are being polluted by the discharge of untreated industrial effluent and urban wastewater, agrochemicals, sewage water, storm runoff, solid waste dumping, oil spillage, sedimentation and encroachment. The water quality also depends on effluent types and discharge quantity from different types of industries, types of agrochemicals used in agriculture, and seasonal water flow and dilution capability by the river system. The river Buriganga is a typical example of serious surface water pollution in our country. In the present scenario this river carries only wastewater during the months (November to April) of the dry season becoming toxic during this period. The level of pollution is so high that no aquatic species can survive in it and the situation is getting worse day by day. Test results during the dry season at eight points along the river found the level of dissolved oxygen within 0.6 to 1.8 mg/l at five points and zero at other points. The requisite level of oxygen is more than 5 mg/l for the survival of aquatic lives. In fact, the Buriganga has become a dumping ground of all kinds of solid, liquid and chemical wastes which are generated by the activities in and around the river. Studies show that up to 18,500 cubic metres of liquid wastes, 19,000 kilograms of solid wastes and 17,600 kilograms of biological oxygen demand load go into the Buriganga each day from these sources. The Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority sources confirmed that huge quantities of discarded polythene deposits are unearthed near Sadarghat area during dredging.
Like many other countries of the world, river pollution control in Bangladesh has been a burning issue for at least the past two decades. Moreover, abundant research has been undertaken and many recommendations have been forwarded to protect the rivers from further pollution. At the government level since the late 19th century several rules, regulations, policies and strategies have been formulated and a fairly comprehensive set of environmental laws exist to save our rivers from pollution. However, the implementation and enforcement of the policies and the regulations have so far been very ineffective, leading to poorer river water quality. In addition, in many cases the policies and strategies seem far from being practical in terms of their implementation. Though it may appear to be a nightmare to overcome this serious problem but the reality is that we need to get to the core of the problem and implement strategies to safeguard these precious natural resources for the sake of our own survival. It is imperative that rather than having a reactive approach, we need to think of a proactive approach to provide a practical and a sustainable solution to the problem.
The pollution problem of our rivers have become complex because of its multidimensional nature. There are social, economic, political and environmental dimensions to this issue which need to be addressed simultaneously while attempting a sustainable solution to the problem. It is a mammoth challenge for developing countries like Bangladesh where a speedy economic growth is requisite without compromising with the conservation of the natural environment or endangering the livelihood of a particular community such as the fishermen or the farmers.
Like many other developing countries, river pollution control in Bangladesh relies on expensive and somewhat outdated technological solutions transferred from the ‘west’. Moreover, these technologies from industrial countries are not always suitable or easily adaptable to the socio-economic and environmental conditions of developing countries. So far emphasis has been given either on treatment of pollutants through the set up of effluent treatment plants or augmentation of rivers to increase the flow through the construction of river water diversion structures. Even the relocation of the pollution causing agents may not capacitate a permanent solution to the problem unless the pollutants are controlled at their sources through adopting proactive approaches such as cleaner production, recycling and resource recovery mechanism.
Experiences in countries like the United States, Australia and China show that the proactive approaches are being implemented voluntarily by the polluters to reduce their pollutants once the ‘market-based’ mechanisms are introduced. In these systems polluters are not told how much they can pollute or what technology they must use, but their choices will have financial consequences and this will influence the choices they make. With these policies, emission constraints are not source-specific; rather they provide equal incentives to all polluters by increasing the marginal costs of pollution. Moreover, several stakeholders such as producers, consumers, users, government authorities and local community members get directly involved with this process. The importance of inclusion of all the stakeholders (both who generate and manage the pollution) to develop an effective approach for pollution control cannot be undermined.
It is obvious that to protect our rivers from further pollution we need to look beyond the ineffective conventional policies and strategies. We need alternate, innovative and integrated approaches to be implemented to overcome this problem. In this regard, provisions of monetary incentives, rewards and recognitions for the polluters who reduce their pollution may work effectively for reducing the amounts of pollutants which are being discharged into the rivers. The direct involvement of community and civil society can also play a great role for this purpose.
The rivers of Bangladesh suffer from the pollution problem mostly during the dry season (November to April) but the assimilation and the dilution capacity of most of our rivers increase dramatically during the wet season (May to October). This phenomenon of the rivers overrules the application of a uniform acceptable level of the pollutants throughout the year. This opens the possibility for using ‘non-uniform reduction’ measures for the polluters and thus offers flexibility to them in terms of reducing their harmful pollutants for the water bodies.
Another significant issue is that different polluters have different levels of capacity to reduce their pollutants. Some are better off than others to control their pollutants. This tendency opens the opportunity for the application of a tradable permit system for water pollution control. This system allows pollution to be reduced wherever it is least costly to do so and a ‘cap’ guarantees the total allowable emissions are not exceeded. For instance, the Hunter River Salinity Trading Scheme of Australia leads the world in using such economic instruments for the effective protection of waterways. This scheme involves a number of point sources of salinity in the Hunter River and the average river salinity has been halved since the scheme commenced in1996, while economic activity and employment have grown substantially. It has thus become a classic example of win-win situation for all the stakeholders who are involved with the use of the river.
Regular monitoring of river water quality (physical, chemical and biological composition) is an important aspect to control river pollution. However, this is an expensive and time consuming ongoing activity which might be difficult for any government agency like the Department of Environment alone to perform the task on a regular basis. Even the powerful agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States assign this task to the community with assistance from the local administration. In Bangladesh we may think of exploring this option to ease the monitoring activity of hundreds of rivers in our country.
We need to shift from the nightmare of river pollution management to the serenity of our beautiful rivers by any means. In summary, a suggestive list of prescription is given below to help make this issue a reality.
* An action plan with its processes has to be developed on the basis of the prospective market-based instruments.
* The method of permit allocation and lifespan of permits need to be addressed.
* An information system should be established to provide potential participants relevant information on river water pollution.
* Procedures for compliance monitoring must be identified for designing a new program.
* A package of incentives, appreciation and recognition of the industries and other polluters who do better work in reducing their pollutants should be developed.
* A system of assessing the environmental reputation of the industries should be developed to measure as criteria in financial lending process.
* A guideline has to be developed for introducing the community monitoring system.
* The concern of the local community regarding the pollution has to be formally recognised by the regulatory authority.
* A strong market pressure should be created on the polluters to shift to cleaner production technologies.
* Environmental education should become mandatory from all primary to tertiary level of educational institutes.
As we would all agree the time has come to take actions to protect our rivers from further degradation and before nature takes revenge on us. However, the prerequisite of taking any action is that we need environmentally aware and enlightened people for the purpose. Awareness about the negative consequences of our harmful activities which ultimately affect our precious natural resources including rivers can minimize the damage caused to them in many folds. That is why it is high time to stress on environmental education from the primary to the tertiary level of studies in our country because learners of today are the leaders of tomorrow.

M Ashiqur Rahman, a senior lecturer of the North South University, is currently on a study leave to pursue PhD in environmental management at the University of Sydney, Australia.

NewAgeBD
Read more »

June 7, 2009

Bangladesh PM makes river pledge

In pictures: Bangladesh flood misery

The Bangladeshi Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina, has pledged to do her utmost to save the country's "severely degraded river systems".

She said that people must be prepared for climate change and engage in more "environmentally-friendly activities".

Bangladesh is criss-crossed by rivers and creeks which are vital for irrigation and transport purposes.

The prime minister also criticised the country's weather forecasters, ordering them to be more alert about cyclones.

Last month Cyclone Aila killed at least 200 people in Bangladesh and India and left 500,000 homeless.

'Imminent catastrophe'

In a speech to mark World Environment Day, the prime minister said it was necessary to protect the country's rivers "to save people from imminent catastrophe".

"All our rivers today have lost the free flows they had in the past due to heavy silt depositions," she said.

"But once the rivers are given back their original beds, frequent overflowing will cease, reducing the negative impact of global climate change in our region."

Sheikh Hasina said that Bangladesh's ample river systems had maintained the "environmental balance since time immemorial".

She said that rivers had been losing their water-retention capacity because of "heavy siltation and unbridled encroachment".

"We must save our rivers," she said, "even though it is going to be a huge, time consuming and challenging project. But we must do it.

"Whatever the costs be, we'll do the job."

She said that rivers could be preserved through dredging and other erosion-countering measures.

The prime minister also said that more must be done to improve the country's food security whenever there are natural disasters such as floods and cyclones.

She said that developing the capacity to store food for at least two to three years was an important first step.

BBC
Read more »

June 6, 2009

Bangladesh launches campaign to save rivers

Dhaka, June 2 (IANS) Bangladesh’s lawmakers, media and industry leaders have launched a campaign to ’save’ the rivers around the national capital by evicting encroachers and improving the environment.

Called “Save rivers, Save Dhaka” campaign, the programme was launched Monday by parliament Speaker Abdul Hamid with the participation of The Daily Star newspaper and ‘i’TV channel.

Agriculture Minister Motia Choudhury assured government support. He and Speaker Abdul Hamid resolved to come up with a law that would end encroachment.

The Daily Star has undertaken a mission to focus on the dying rivers Buriganga, Turag, Balu and Shitalakhya that encircle Dhaka, the 400-year-old capital.

The newspaper has been campaigning to end the encroachment. The banks have been encroached and even ’sold’.

Bangladesh is a riverine country with numerous river systems, the larger ones being Padma, Meghna and Brahmaputra.

Poor river management, silting, absence of dredging and the rising population have reduced the country’s riverbed from 5,000 km to 3,600 km, according to a recent report of the Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority (BIWTA).

The government is taking measures to carry out dredging of rivers since shipping activity at its river ports, among them Chittagong, Mangla and Khulna has been badly hit.

“We must save our rivers, which have been seriously polluted and partly grabbed. Influential people whoever they are cannot be any barrier to the justified demands of common people,” said Hamid.

Abdur Razzak, chairman of the standing committee on the Ministry of Water Resources, said it is not the absence of laws, but the negligence in their application that has almost killed the rivers surrounding the capital.

News Link
Campaign on Daily Star link
Read more »

June 5, 2009

Can river silt save Bangladesh?

By Katherine Harmon in 60-Second Science Blog

Bangladeshis are already feeling the effects of climate change, especially those living on the low-lying river delta near the mouths of the Ganges. Frequent floods and stronger storms have been inundating the area with more water than many local rice growers can cope with, driving thousands to seek work in overcrowded cities.

But some rice and shrimp farmers are holding out hope that the very waters that have oft plagued them might hold the solution – in suspension. River silt, carried down in suspension from the ancient Himalayan mountains hundreds of miles away, might be able to build up land elevation to save the area's livelihoods and homes, The New York Times reports today.

In Bangladesh, deposited sediment has been slowly filling the marshy delta outward into the Bay of Bengal for the past few decades, but engineers are examining ways that it might be used to build the land up rather than out, according to the Times. The goal is to allow water to flood some especially low areas and let it out – through dams and channels – slowly. As the murky water slows, sediment drops out and filters to the bottom, leaving a new bed of silt after the water recedes. Residents in Beel Bhaina discovered this phenomenon after releasing stagnant floodwaters through an embankment; to the surprise of many, the Times reports, three feet (or more) of silt had been deposited, boosting land higher above sea level.

"Usually people are trying to get rid of the sediment," says John Gray, a hydrologist at the U.S. Geological Survey. "But here, people are using it as a resource." But Gray is skeptical that it's a viable answer. One major obstacle, he tells ScientificAmerican.com, is that it would require yet more flooding to achieve decent amount of sediment buildup.

"If they're really talking about building land," he says, "the experimental patches are a good start, but they're really going to have to start working on a much large scale."

Gray praises the effort, noting that it's "laudable" to try to "take something that most consider a nuisance" and turn it into an asset. But he warns that if massive quantities of water are diverted, unexpected consequences, such changes in river behavior, are likely to occur. Gray isn't even sure that it's a surefire stopgap against rising sea levels, which are predicted to top three feet by the end of this century. "The timing of accretion [deposit of the sediment] and the timing of the climate change, he says, "might not be compatible."

Centuries of engineering have gone into clearing river channels and mouths of silt to make them more navigable and easier to control. But as rivers have been carved out and dammed for easier navigation, sediment rushes out to sea, rather than getting deposited in the delta. This means many deltas worldwide, including the Mississippi River Delta in Louisiana, the Nile Delta in Egypt, the Yangtze Delta in China and others, are disappearing, leaving costal towns and cities more vulnerable to increasingly strong storm surges. If Bangladesh succeeds in bracing its floodplains this way, it might be a new safeguard for costal areas across the globe. But the proof will be in the (rice) pudding.

Image of Bangladeshi farmers harvesting rice in flooded fields courtesty of the International Rice Research Institute via Flickr

Scientific American
Read more »

June 4, 2009

Laws there, loopholes too

That’s not strawberry ice cream but pure toxic dyes. Untreated wastes from a single dying factory along the river Shitalakkhya create this layer of deadly froth. Hundreds of such factories have turned the river into a lifeless water body. Photo: Amran Hossain

Pinaki Roy

Not a lack of laws, but a lack of proper implementation of the existing laws is the reason for the dire condition of the country's rivers, canals, and other water bodies.

Over the years, successive governments failed to implement relevant laws for conserving the rivers and other natural water resources, resulting in rampant encroachment on those, and in their wholesale pollution by industries, while the Environment Conservation Act 1995 stayed in books.

The definition of a river is also sketchy in the laws. Generally Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority (BIWTA) is in charge of the rivers and riverbanks where there are river routes, under the Bengal Port Act 1908.

But if there is no river route then it becomes hard to figure out who has the authority over the rivers, as many authorities including land offices, district administrations, local governments, the water resources ministry, and the Water Development Board -- all have some kind of role or control over the rivers and riverbanks according to relevant laws.

At the moment there is no unified law that clearly defines what is a river, a riverbank, or an off shore, and lawful use of river water is also not well delineated. To save the rivers from encroachment and pollution, a unified law and a dedicated authority that will implement the law as the regulatory body, are imperative.

The first law regarding water bodies was enacted during the British colonial age in 1864 to control and collect tolls from river routes.

The Bengal Canal Act 1864 is the mother of all laws about rivers, canals and other water bodies. Beginning from that act up to the recent Open Space and Water Body Conservation Act 2000, all laws restrict changing of the characteristics of water bodies including rivers and riverbanks.

The Bengal canal act says, "It shall be lawful for the government from time to time to authorise any person to make and open any navigable channel, or to clear and deepen any navigable channel, and to stop any watercourse, make any tracking path, or do any other act necessary for the making or improvement of any such channel."

Under that law the government is authorised to 'take possession for a public purpose of any land that may be necessary for the execution of any of the above mentioned works, under the provisions of the act'.

It goes on, "Any person who shall wilfully cause ........ any obstruction to any line of navigation or any damage to the banks or works of such line of navigation, or who shall wilfully omit to remove such obstruction after being lawfully required to do so, shall be punished on conviction before a magistrate with simple imprisonment which may be extended to one month or with fine which may extend to Tk 50, or with both."

The recent significant law to protect natural water resources is titled, 'Wetland and Open Space Conservation Act, 2000', which extended the fine up to Tk 50,000, and the imprisonment up to five years, or both. But successive governments have not been very sincere to implement the law.

On the other hand, the laws specify what punishments the judiciary may mete out to the violators, but it does not direct the government to recover the original characteristics of water bodies if someone fills them up.

So once someone changes the characteristics of a river, canal, or any other water body -- it does not get back its old shape.

Other relevant laws, rules, and regulations in Bangladesh are -- the Bengal Irrigation Act 1876, East Bengal Embankment and Drainage Act 1952, Inland Water Transport Authorities Ordinance 1958, East Pakistan Irrigation (Imposition of Water Rate) Ordinance 1963, Bangladesh Water and Power Development Boards Order 1972 (President order No 59 of 1972), Bangladesh Water Rate Ordinance 1983, Land Reforms Ordinance 1984, Ground Water Management Ordinance 1985, Water Resources Planning Act 1992, Water Supply and Sewerage Authority Act 1996, National Water policy 1999, and the Act No 27 of 2000.

Daily Star
Read more »

June 3, 2009

Death of rivers will lead to death of our cities

Slowly gobbling up the river. Sand traders of the booming construction sector fill up the river Turag, wiping out the river's foreshore, shore, and the channel. There is no authority to check these river killers. Photo: Anisur Rahman

By Mahfuz Anam

It would not be an exaggeration to state that encroachment and pollution of the five rivers surrounding the capital now threaten the very existence of Dhaka city, and with it jeopardise the future of our economy. We would like to draw a direct link between the country's growth prospect and livability of the capital city, which in its turn is directly linked with the existence of the rivers that surround it. Dhaka already has a population that makes its one of the most crowded metropolis in the world. In not to distant a future it will become one of the biggest mega-cities in the world. Fresh water supply will be a crucial issue for such a city and failing to provide it will lead to intense civic unrest and related social instability. No investment, both domestic and foreign, is likely to occur in cities or areas where fresh water supply cannot be guaranteed.

Not only of Dhaka city, but rivers around the country are being filled up or being encroached upon in a manner that is threatening the very existence of human habitation. Very soon, the land grabbers will have gobbled up most of the rivers leaving a barren country greatly increasing the impact of flooding in the wet season and increasing the possibility of desertification of specific areas during the dry season.

Hidden behind the issue of saving our rivers is the concern of supply of fresh water for drinking, cooking and normal livelihood needs that relate to public health issues. According to reports, 80 percent people suffer from jaundice, skin diseases or diarrhoea in the watershed areas.

As rivers around Dhaka got polluted we became more and more dependent on ground water as a source of drinking water. It is reported that presently 86 percent of WASA's drinking water comes from ground water. Due to widespread urbanisation the replenishment of the ground water is not occurring as before as a result of which the ground water level is falling between 1-3 metres every year.

It is our view that the destruction of rivers in Bangladesh, especially those surrounding Dhaka city, has reached a stage so as to pose a threat to our nation's future and as such should be treated a national security concern.

Now is the time for all of us, the public in general, the government, political parties, professional bodies and the civil society to work together to save our rivers, and thus save ourselves.

Daily Star
Read more »

June 2, 2009

What lies beneath

10 ft layer of polythene under Buriganga

Morshed Ali Khan

A ten-feet layer of discarded polythene bags, plastics, coconut shells, and heavy sludge created by millions of tons of biodegradable waste from kitchen markets now cover the bed of the river Buriganga.

The highest concentration of these deadly wastes have settled on the bed of the river near Sadarghat launch terminal in the capital, one of the busiest river ports in South-East Asia, according to Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority (BIWTA) sources.

One of the main sources of this huge amount of polythene on the riverbed is Dhaka City Corporation's (DCC) conservancy department.

Along Shaheed Nagar, Kamrangir Char, Showari Ghat, Waiz Ghat, and Shyam Bazar -- DCC conservancy workers empty their bins of household rubbish into the river everyday. Household rubbish contains a large number of polythene bags, which are too dirty for the tokais (street urchins) to sort out for sales for recycling.

DCC conservancy department's second-in-command, Dewan Shah Alam, admitted that such irregularities are taking place along the river Buriganga, but added that most of the dumping is done by private household garbage collectors, not the DCC trucks.

"We have strict instructions for all our staff involved in garbage disposal, not to dump waste anywhere other that the designated site at Amin Bazar," Shah Alam said.

BIWTA sources said the situation in the river is almost out of their hand with limited resources and also due to a lack of proper directions. They said they do not have adequate manpower to stop the dumping of rubbish into the river, which takes place all along the flood protection embankment. There are instances when DCC conservancy workers 'signed deals' with river grabbers, and dumped truck loads of household rubbish into the river. Such dumping usually takes place so early in the morning that officials, who should be monitoring, are hardly awake let alone being on the spot.

"I can show you, between Mohammadpur and Postagola more than 50 sites where DCC is dumping rubbish," said a BIWTA official requesting anonymity.

On the slope of the flood protection embankment at Kamrangir Char, dozens of female workers can be regularly found washing and drying huge polythene sheets. They said they buy those sheets from business establishments in Nawabpur and Mitford areas, from garment factories, and from the tokais.

"After buying these dirty sheets we wash and dry them on the embankment and carefully pack them for reselling by weight to buyers, who pay us good prices. Why should we discard them into the river, recycling is our livelihood," said Moina Begum, when asked how so many polythene bags found their way to the riverbed.

Moina's co-worker Hafiza Khatun pointed her finger at a dumping site on the slope of the embankment, and said most of the small polythene in household rubbish piles end up into the river because those cannot be sorted out easily.

On one Friday afternoon, Sadarghat Launch Terminal area was a chaotic crossroad with thousands of passengers, coolies, traders, squatters, and beggars milling around. On the shore between the concrete terminal and the jetty -- human excreta, piles of coconut shells, polythene bags, and an array of rubbish were lying around.

A dozen launches were anchored at the jetty. Vendors selling coconuts, lychees, bombay-mix, puffed rice, bread, and fruits were using the river as a dumping ground.

"The accumulation of polythene and other wastes is so deep and solid that it might not be possible to remove the wastes with a dredger, we might have to do it manually," said an official of BIWTA.

The government banned production, marketing, and use of polythene bags in 2002. An offender under the law may be sentenced to ten years of imprisonment and fined Tk 10 lakh.

Daily Star
Read more »

June 1, 2009

Death of a lifeline

Thus die the rivers. Trimohoni, off the river Balu, on the eastern fringe of the capital bears the unbearable testimony of pollution originating mainly from Dhaka Wasa's sewerage system that dumps untreated wastes in the network of canals connected to the river. PHOTO: SK Enamul Haq Inam Ahmed and Morshed Ali Khan

The kingfisher was sitting lonely in the gathering dusk on a dead branch sticking out of tar black water. Our handkerchiefs were proving too inadequate to keep the stench out of our nostrils. With each stroke of the oar, a thick liquid similar to burnt lube oil splashed up. The sound of the oar was blunt and heavy, like hitting mud with a stick.

We were surprised at the kingfisher -- the first sighting of any bird that depends on water for survival. It means there must be fish too in this muck that we still call a river -- Buriganga. Our hope evaporated soon as the kingfisher dived and picked up an insect, looking like the ones you find in your septic tank. When fish is gone, sewage insects are the only feed.

For the last three hours we have been sailing through a river that resembles nothing but pure muck. From Bosila Ghat near the under-construction Third Buriganga Bridge up to as far as you may go towards Munshiganj, the river is just a flowing black sheet of sewage. The stench only increased when the propeller of passing barges whipped up the 'water'. The Buriganga river today is the most stunning monument to an environmental disaster where no vertebrate life form survives. It is a river without fish and water.

One of the main sources of this highly toxic sludge is just on the other side of the river at Hazaribagh of the capital. From there, nearly 250 large leather industries and several hundred small ones have been dumping untreated chemical-mixed water into the river. Every day they pump a staggering 22,000 cubic metres of poison into the Buriganga. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) bulletin, every day these units also dump ten tons of solid waste into the river. Efforts to relocate them to a modern zone in Savar, equipped with effluent treatment plants (ETP), has not worked out in years, as neither the industry owners nor the government want to pay for the relocation cost. Nobody has ever calculated how much these industries contribute to the economy, and how much they destroy.

Polluters vs fishermen
Experts believe Hazaribagh tanneries alone inflict the most severe blow to the air, land, and water in the city. The air within a ten-kilometre radius of the Hazaribagh tanneries is so foul and toxic that thousands of people suffer from various respiratory and skin diseases. Residents in Hazaribagh, Lalbagh, Azimpur, Rayer Bazar, Dhanmondi, and Beri Bandh areas complain of 'corrosion' in their tin roofs and other metal household objects. Housewives even complain of having their ornaments corroded due to the toxicity in the air.

While our industries proudly boast of foreign exchange earnings, no matter how much pollution they are causing by refusing to install ETPs, thousands of traditional fishermen who have been tossed out of the rivers and canals, think if the rivers and canals around the city were clean, they could also bring in a huge amount of foreign currencies, producing and exporting good quality fishes.

Lakhan Rajbangshi from Zaillapara, Basila where a fishermen community of 50 families have lived for over 100 years, said the Buriganga alone could produce enough fish to feed the city population.

"We are spending crores of taka in foreign currencies to import fish from Myanmar, India, and Thailand, but I can assure you, if you return us our river with flow of good quality water we would start exporting river produce within a year," Lakhan, who is now unemployed and miserable, said.

Three days before, we had gone to the Shitalakkhya river near Kanchpur Bridge and saw the unbelievable sight of a swath of 'strawberry shake' tone of purple dye pouring into the river through a drain pipe, frothing and spreading across the river, poisoning everything as it worked through.

At Demra, we again oared through a filthy liquid that is the Shitalakkhya. A small channel that comes parallel to the main river was disgorging effluent at full speed from nearby industries. The refuse then mix with the Shitalakkhya water and ripple down in bubbles poisoning fishes to death, and seeping into the underground aquifer, polluting that as well.

A more horrifying story emerges about the possible contamination of the city's groundwater, as a study jointly done by the World Bank and the Institute of Water Modelling (IWM) warns that the groundwater, on which over 80 percent of the city's population depend, is fast getting contaminated. The contamination mainly occurs at river beds, and at industrial effluent dumping points from where aquifers get recharged. While the Hazaribagh groundwater is classified as the most affected, with time the groundwater pollution is creeping towards other parts of the city too.

Sorry tale of Trimohoni
Residents of Nandigram near the eastern fringe of the city should have been the luckiest people on earth because three rivers -- the Narai, Devdholai, and the Balu -- meet there to form the Trimohoni and pass through the village. Instead local residents consider themselves cursed and doomed. Millions of cubic metres of sewage, and industrial and household wastes generated in the capital's Tejgaon, Dhanmondi, Gulshan, Rajabazar, Maghbazar, Motijheel, Bashabo, and many other densely populated areas fall into the Trimohoni. We, living in plush apartments in the capital, are the source of their misery, as each time we flush our toilets the Trimohoni residents receive it in their rivers through Dhaka Water and Sewerage Authority's (Wasa) outlets at Rampura and Motijheel through Begunbari canal. The Nandigram people are now surrounded by rivers of excreta, where the rivers flow with everything but water.

In Trimohoni area we stood at the doorway of a hut in the smelly village watching a sick child curled up in a bed. Her breaths were shallow. For two days, she had been having a bout of diarrhoea. Her mother had repeatedly warned her not to go near the poisoned river. Still she had taken a dip in the river in a forgetful moment. And now she was in a terrible state.

Pitch black effluents from Tejgaon Industrial Area containing heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and magnesium are causing serious pollution in Begunbari and Narai canals, leading to pollution of the Balu river. Interestingly, the same river is one of the major sources of water for Saidabad Water Treatment Plant for Dhaka city in the downstream, where it joins the Shitalakkhya. Experts already warned that the river water around the metropolis is so contaminated that it is 'beyond treatment'. Our lack of foresight in planning is well established in the setting up of the water treatment plant at Saidabad before thinking about installing ETPs in our highly polluting industrial units. There is no data to indicate contamination of the supplied water, but frequent outbreaks of waterborne diseases surely suggest an alarming level of contamination in our tap water.

Turag, Buriganga, Shitalakkhya
The Turag river is another bead in the string of the dying rivers that surround the capital. Only a trickle of black liquid represents the river that serves as the lifeline of the southern fringe of the capital. Not only pollution, currently there are more earth filling projects in the Turag than in any other river of the city.

The existence of all these rivers has been pushed to a further edge by a free-for-all encroachment galore. We sailed for miles up and down the four rivers and saw the chilling evidence of how criminals and renowned business enterprises are taking their claims in the rivers at will. And there is no one to stop them; no vigil to identify them.

As we sailed through the Buriganga, we spotted a vast swath of the river fenced off with bamboo poles near Kholamora. Dredgers were moored there that roared sand-filled water inside the fenced area. The river was being filled up, slowly. Already about 500 feet of the river has been turned into land where stands a concrete structure. Another 500 feet or so are in the process of being filled. We stood there and searched for the original river boundary, and finally located the embankment about half a kilometre away that once marked the beginning of the river. That half a kilometre is already gone to meet the appetite of the encroachers. Another half a mile will be gone, in who knows how many months, or days.

A few hundred yards down, we found a few hundred acres of land jutting out into the river in the name of 'Titanic Housing', the same crook is filling up more sections of the river with earth and nobody to stop it. A building is standing right in the middle of the river. Fresh signs of earth-filling of the river are everywhere. It is an awe-striking sight. How effortlessly they are gobbling up the river, making it slimmer and slimmer until nothing will be left.

The same is the case along the Turag and Shitalakkhya. Universities and housing projects have sprung up in the rivers. Sand traders have expanded into the waters, fencing off their own stakes. Industries have found land. It is an unfettered bonanza of river grabbing. You grab it and cook up some documents. Pay tax for the land, which once was part of a river, by some strange manipulation of the system. And it is all yours on the cheap.

Dry canals
The story does not stop here. Just when you think things cannot get any worse, they do. We found canal after canal that either fed into the river systems of Dhaka or fed from them, are choked and dead now. It is mayhem of an unprecedented scale. Even whole river systems have been rendered dry.

Standing on 'a private road' to a brick kiln at Waaspur we witnessed what havoc could be wreaked by a single person. The brick kiln owner built the road chocking the passage for one of the most widely used canals, Atir Khal. As far as the eyes can see, the canal is just a dry gulch. For over 50 years, Atir Khal that winds its way through dozens of important trading centres in Keraniganj and Savar areas, has served millions of farmers and commuters. Today, it could at best be a grazing ground for cattle.

Dhaka by any measure is supposed to be an ideal location for human settlement -- a very few cities have four rivers encircling them. It is supposed to have constant sources of clean surface water supply, a fantastic navigability around the city, which is a source of tourism, and of entertainment for its residents -- all centring the rivers. Because of all these features, the Mughals had chosen it as their capital in Bengal.

But today, the residents of the city have almost forgotten the rivers. In their daily life bound to the traffic packed streets, they do not feel the existence of the Buriganga, Shitalakkhya, Turag, and the Balu. We have let them flow towards extinction.

But the Dhaka residents are already paying for that indifference. Groundwater extraction for supplying household water is dragging down the groundwater table by about 9 feet every year. A big underground void poses the risk that the city might collapse into the pit. It is high time we wake up.

Daily Star
Read more »